Meta-analysis of the available research looks at primary and secondary patient outcomes of applying mechanical CPR compression devices following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest
Mechanical vs Manual CPR Chest Compressions
Mechanical versus manual chest compressions for cardiac arrest - Wang, PL - 2018
PDF) A pilot study of mechanical chest compressions with the LUCAS™ device in cardiopulmonary resuscitation
Robot paramedics' are being used in the UK to carry out CPR on patients in ambulances
Mechanical chest compression devices: historical evolution, classification and current practices, a short review - Document - Gale Academic OneFile
Rescue under ongoing CPR from an upper floor: evaluation of three different evacuation routes and mechanical and manual chest compressions: a manikin trial, Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine
LUCAS Versus Manual Chest Compression During Ambulance Transport: A Hemodynamic Study in a Porcine Model of Cardiac Arrest
Clinical evidence - LUCAS - Chest Compression System
Bioengineering, Free Full-Text
PDF) Manual versus mechanical cardiopulmonary resuscitation. An experimental study in pigs
Hands-on or Hands-off: Manual versus Mechanical Chest Compressions
Mechanical versus manual chest compressions for cardiac arrest: a systematic review and meta-analysis, Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine
PDF) Mechanical vs. Manual Chest Compressions for Cardiac Arrest
