Red card holder (RCH) teams have developed during the last two decades of collaborative air interventions undertaken by NATO or groups of like‐minded states under US leadership. In such coalition contexts, different fighter jets are tasked, from a central US headquarter, to strike (or, in military language, ‘engage’) specific targets that have been developed to achieve the objectives of the mission. Yet, prior to a fighter jet from a specific nation striking a target, the national RCH Team must first approve this.
Comparing the Strategic Worldviews of the United States and China: Implications for Strategy and Engagement with Africa > Air University (AU) > Journal of Indo-Pacific Affairs Article Display
Air transport Times Aerospace
Military techno-vision: Technologies between visual ambiguity and the desire for security facts, European Journal of International Security
Katja JACOBSEN, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Department of Political Science
Katja JACOBSEN, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Department of Political Science
PDF) Optimizing Coalition Air Warfare: The Emergence and Ethical Dilemmas of Red Card Holder Teams
Article: The costs and consequences of drone warfare – Intimacies of Remote Warfare
Journal Article: Optimizing Coalition Air Warfare: The Emergence and Ethical Dilemmas of Red Card Holder Teams – Intimacies of Remote Warfare
REVIEW - Air Power Studies
