Canine retraction with segmented arches alternative in patients with severe dental crowding: clinical case
PDF] Effectiveness of laceback ligatures on maxillary canine retraction.
PDF) Canine retraction rate and angulation with 0.017”X0.025” versus Canine retraction rate and angulation with 0.017”X0.025” versus 0.016”X0.022” stainless steel arch wire with a power arm 0.016”X0.022” stainless steel arch wire with
T-loop spring vs ricketts maxillary canine retractor in canine retraction efficacy and anchorage loss control: A cone-beam computed tomography study - ScienceDirect
PDF) Individual canine retraction: RCT comparing Mulligan bypasses arch and Active laceback ligatures
PDF] Effectiveness of laceback ligatures on maxillary canine retraction.
PDF) Comparison Between Laceback and Tie-back in Sliding Mechanics (An in vitro study)
PDF) Individual canine retraction: RCT comparing Mulligan bypasses arch and Active laceback ligatures
PDF] Effectiveness of laceback ligatures on maxillary canine retraction.
PDF) Individual canine retraction: RCT comparing Mulligan bypasses arch and Active laceback ligatures
PDF) Individual canine retraction: RCT comparing Mulligan bypasses arch and Active laceback ligatures
PDF) The Impact of Canine Retraction on Anchorage Loss in Two Methods of Active Lace Back and NiTi Closed Coil Spring
Comparison of maxillary canine retraction patterns with the T-loop spring and the Ricketts maxillary canine retractor: A cone-beam computed tomography study - ScienceDirect
Quantitative and qualitative assessment of anchorage loss during en-masse retraction with indirectly loaded miniscrews in patients with bimaxillary protrusion
V2 - PLANETS of ORTHODONTICS - Volume II - Diagnosis and Treatment Planning, PDF, Tooth
